Smt. Dhanalakshmi & Anr. v. Smt. Susheela & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PATIL AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA Misc. Cvl. 168 of 2011 M.F.A.No. 36 of 2011(FC) Between:
Smt. Dhanalakshmi, W/o. Late K.Nagaraj, and another. (By
Smt. Pramila Nesargi, Senior Advocate for M/s. Pramila Associates) And:
Smt. Susheela, and others. (By
Sri. M.A.George, Advocate for R1, R3 to R5; R2 served) ***** ….Appellants ……Respondents
This Misc. Cvl. is filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, R/w. Section 151 of CPC, praying to condone the delay of 177 days in filing the above appeal, in the interest of justice and equity. This Misc. Cvl coming on for Orders this day, N.K. PATIL J., made the following: 2 :
O R D E R:
This Misc. Cvl., is filed by the learned counsel for the appellants for condonation of delay of 177 days in filing the appeal. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants. Neither the respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 5 nor their counsel is present. Respodnent No.2 served and unrepresented. The delay of 177 days in filing the appeal has been satisfactorily explained in the affidavit filed along with the application, sufficient cause is shown and the same is accepted. Hence, for the reasons stated in the affidavit filed along with the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, this Misc. Cvl. is allowed. Sd/- JUDGE ` tsn* Sd/- JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.