M. Mahadevappa v. Siddalingaswamy
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, appeal is disposed off in terms of the compromise petition
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, appeal is disposed off in terms of the compromise petition. The appellants have been handed over Demand Draft of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakh only) each and accepted the same. Court fee if any, shall be returned to the respective parties, as per law.
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV SRI. H. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY, MEMBER & R.S.A.No. 35/2024 (DEC) (Lok Adalat No. 2365/2024) BETWEEN: 1 . M. Mahadevappa, S/o Late Ramappa, Aged about 73 years,
#2. Revamma, W/o. M. Mahadevappa, Aged about 68 years, Both are R/at Badanaguppe Village, Kasaba Hobli, Chamarajanagar Taluk - 571313. ...APPELLANTS (By Sri. Sharath Gowda G.B., Advocate) AND 1 . Siddalingaswamy, S/o Late Kempanna, Aged about 64 years, 2
#2. Guruprasad S., S/o. Siddalingaswamy, Aged about 36 years, Both are R/at LIG, Door No.8, Sri. Gurumalleshwara Nilaya, K. H. B. Colony, Hootagalli, Hanasur Road, Mysore - 570003. ...RESPONDENTS (By Sri. Nandish R., Advocate) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.09.2023 AND IN RA.NO.67/2022 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT CHAMARAJANAGAR AND CONSEQUENTLY CONFIRM THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.10.2022 PASSED IN O.S.NO.145/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, CHAMARAJANAGAR. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER Appellant No.1 Sri. M. Mahadevappa, appellant No.2 Smt. Revamma, respondent No.1 Sri. Siddalingaswamy and respondent No.2 Sri. Guruprasad S., are present along with their respective counsel.
#2. Learned counsel for the appellants files the compromise petition dated
13.07.2024 along with the copy of demand drafts. 3
#3. Perused the compromise petition, contents of which has been explained in the language known to the parties.
#4. Both the parties have accepted the terms of the compromise petition and have submitted that they have entered into this compromise out of their own free will and volition and there is no force or influence in entering compromise. Hence, compromise petition is lawful.
#5. Accordingly, appeal is disposed off in terms of the compromise petition. The appellants have been handed over Demand Draft of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakh only) each and accepted the same. Court fee if any, shall be returned to the respective parties, as per law.
#6. Decree to be drawn in terms of the compromise petition. Sd/- JUDGE SD/- MEMBER MCR
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, appeal is disposed off in terms of the compromise petition
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.