✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI. K.N.NANJUNDAPPA v. TAHASILDAR, TURUVEKERE

RSA No. 39 of 2019JYOTI MULIMANI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 39 OF 2019 (INJ) BETWEEN: SRI. K.N.NANJUNDAPPA S/O LATE NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT KUNIKENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 227. (BY SRI. NITISH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.V.NARASIMHAN., ADVOCATE) AND: TAHASILDAR, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TURUVEKERE. …APPELLANT (SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) …RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri. Nitish., counsel on behalf of Sri.K.V.Narasimhan., for the appellant has appeared in person. - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:45797 RSA No. 39 of 2019 Counsel Sri. Nitish., submits that Sri.K.N.Nanjundappa - the sole appellant died a year back. The oral submission made by counsel Sri. Nitish., about the death of the sole appellant is placed on record. The application to bring the legal representation of deceased sole appellant is not filed. By operation of law, the Regular Second Appeal abates. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 21

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. RSA No. 39 of 2019). ← Search more judgments