M/S. TOYOTA BOSHOKU AUTOMOTIVE v. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND, COMMISSIONER - II, REGIONAL OFFICE, RR NAGAR, BANGALORE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accepting his submission, petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Four weeks time is granted to file the petition before the Tribunal and if the petition is so filed, the same shall be disposed in accordance with law and all the other contentions kept open are to be decided by the Tribunal. Sd/- (ANANT…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 99 OF 2018 (L-PF) BETWEEN: M/S. TOYOTA BOSHOKU AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PVT. LTD., NO.41, BHIMENAHALLI, M.N. HALLI, P.O. BIDADI, RAMANAGARAM TALUK, BANGALORE - 562 109. (BY MS. PRACHISHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRASHANTH B.K, ADVOCATE) AND: THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND, COMMISSIONER - II, REGIONAL OFFICE, RR NAGAR, BANGALORE. REP. BY PF COMMISSIONER. …PETITIONER …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. NANDITA HALDIPUR, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE RESPONDENT DATED 21.12.2017 [ANNEXURE-G] AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:22218 WP No. 99 of 2018 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be given the liberty to approach the Central Government Industrial Tribunal as the present petition was filed when the Central Government Industrial Tribunal was not functioning.
Operative part
Accepting his submission, petition is disposed of. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the Central Government Industrial Tribunal.
Time spent in prosecuting the present petition is to be excluded in computing the period of limitation, if any.
Four weeks time is granted to file the petition before the Tribunal and if the petition is so filed, the same shall be disposed in accordance with law and all the other contentions kept open are to be decided by the Tribunal. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE LDC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1/CT: BHK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accepting his submission, petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.