SMT. SHAKUNTALA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With these observations, the petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 106771 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SHAKUNTALA WD/O. BASAVANT KANKANWADI, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. HUKKERI, TQ: HUKKERI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591309. (BY SRI. SACHCHIDANAND BABAJI PATIL, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGHCOURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-01.
THE TAHASHILDAR, HUKKERI, TQ: HUKKERI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591309.
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYAT, HUKKERI, TQ: HUKKERI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591309.
THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BORGAL VILLAGE, TQ: HUKKERI, DIST: BEALGAVI-591236. (BY SRI. ASHOK T. KATTIMANI, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. V. SHIVARAJ HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4) …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:17490 WP No. 106771 of 2024 HC-KAR THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT QUASHING THE LETTER BEARING NUMBER KRA.SAM.GRA.PA.BO/KAVI/2023-24 DATED 22/02/2024 GIVEN BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT COPY AS PER ANNEXURE-N; AND ISSUE DIRECTION TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO ENTER THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN THE PROPERTY REGISTER OF THE BORGAL VILLAGE, TQ: HUKKERI AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the prayer does not survive for consideration, as respondents/Authorities have entered the name of the petitioner in the property records.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents is permitted to file the compliance report in the registry. As compliance has been reported, no further order is required.
Operative part
3. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE PMP CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 129
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With these observations, the petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.