JAMMU SR. NO.2 RP No. 49 of 2024 · High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, the instant application is allowed and the words “National
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Through: Mr. Kuldip Singh Parihar, Advocate Collector Land Acquisition and Anr .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Aparna Gupta, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Mr. Vipan Gandotra, Advocate Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD. YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE ORDER 22.07.2024 RP No. 49/2024 Perusal of the instant review petition which is duly supported by an affidavit, reveals that the petitioner/appellant No. 1 seeks the review of order dated 02.07.2024 passed in the main appeal bearing No. CFA No. 15/2017 titled as “Kaka Ram and Others V/s Collector Land Acquisition Kathua and Another” at para 8 to the extent that instead of words “National Highways Authorities Act 1988” the words “National Highways Act 1956” was to be mentioned as the acquisition proceedings ought to have been initiated under the said provisions of the Act 1956. The error appears to have been crept in out of inadvertence. Accordingly, the instant application is allowed and the words “National Highways Authorities Act 1988” occurring in para 8 of the order dated
02.07.2024 are ordered to read as “National Highways Act 1956”. The instant application is disposed of. This order shall form part of the order dated 02.07.2024 passed by this Court in CFA No. 15/2017. The main petition be listed for hearing on 25.07.2024. (A (Mohd. Yousuf Wani) Judge Jammu 22.07.2024 Javid Iqbal Javid Iqbal 2024.07.24 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the instant application is allowed and the words “National
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
National Highways Authorities Act, 1988; National Highways Act, 1956.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.