ARISAPU RAMBABU v. UNION OF INDIA
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 02 Feb 2026
- Bench
- B KRISHNA MOHAN
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5069/2024 Between:
1. ARISAPU RAMBABU, S/O. DHARMARAJU, AGED 58 YEARS, OCC R/O. D. NO. 1-315, GOKAVARAM VILLAGE, AGRICULTURE, GOKAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2. NALLA KANAKA DURGA, W/O. LATE BHASKAR RAO, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC HOME MAKER, R/O. D. NO. 51/2, GOKAVARAM VILLAGE, GOKAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. ARISAPU RAJKUMAR, S/O. RAMBABU, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC R/O. D. NO. 1-315, GOKAVARAM VILLAGE, AGRICULTURE, GOKAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND
UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI.
THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER RANDB, NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.5069 of 2024 the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the notification in S.O 4848 (E) dated 08.11.2023 published in Gazette on 9-11-2023 by the 1st respondent and the endorsement in Ref. A/NH/2444/2023 dated 04.01.2024 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of the provisions of National Highways Act 1956 and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and to consequently set aside the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of notification in S.O 4848 (E) dated 08.11.2023 published in Gazette on 9-11-2023 by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the writ petition. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dated:28.02.2024 in WP.No.5069 of 2024 Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.5069 of 2024 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition, for which he addressed a letter dated 30.01.2026 to the Registrar (Judicial).
2. Permission is accorded.
Operative part
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
02.02.2026 PGT
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; National Highways Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 02 Feb 2026. The bench was B KRISHNA MOHAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.