Jammu And Kashmir And Ladakh High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In light of the aforesaid development, the present petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Through: Mr. Faheem Showkat Butt, Advocate. Vs. UT of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 03.11.2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner through the medium of the present petition has called in question order dated 29.06.2022 passed by District Magistrate Doda, whereby, the petitioner has been illegally and arbitrarily detained under the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978 by virtue of which the petitioner has been detained and lodged in the Central Jail, Kot Bhalwal, Jammu. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the stand taken by the respondents in their reply in particular reference to Para-B, it has been submitted that another detention order has been passed after deliberation by the detaining authority and subjective satisfaction on the recommendations/dossier filed by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Doda and detention order has been passed. 2 WP (Crl) No. 28/2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already assailed the subsequent detention order by way of separate proceedings by filing a petition which is pending adjudication before this Court. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks dismissal of the present petition as having been rendered infructuous. In light of the aforesaid development, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous and interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. Disposed of, accordingly. Jammu 03.11.2022 Shivalee (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In light of the aforesaid development, the present petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
J&K Public Safety Act, 1978.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.