Mohd. Danish v. Union of India & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of the impugned order, having out lived its life, with the efflux of time, this petition has been rendered infructuous. Thus, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous along with all connected application(s).
Judgment
Through: Mr. Mohd. Hafiz Nazki, Advocate. Vs Union of India & Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Sumant Sudan, Advocate vice Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER (07.08.2025)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has challenged Order No. U-11011/21/2024 dated 26.07.2024, whereby, he had been ordered to be detained under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988, by the orders of the Joint Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, (PITNDPS UNIT) and that this order has out lived its life, being for a maximum period of one year only and submits that appropriate orders be passed.
In view of the impugned order, having out lived its life, with the efflux of time, this petition has been rendered infructuous. Thus, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous along with all connected application(s).
The petitioner shall be released forthwith, if not released, provided he is not been required in any other case(s). (M. A. CHOWDHARY) JUDGE Jammu 07.08.2025 Neha-1
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.