Mehraj ud Din karchoo v. UT of JK & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 0202. Confronted with this situation, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal so as to enable the appellant to prefer an appeal against the Order dated 16th May,2 025 passed by the court of Special Judge, Unlawful Activities Prevention Act…
Judgment
AT SRINAGAR CrlA (D) 52/2025 CrlM. No. 953/2025 Mehraj ud Din karchoo …Appellant(s). Through: Mr. H. Furrahi, Advocate Vs. UT of JK and Anr. ...Respondent(s). Through: Mr. Mohsin Qadiri, Sr. AAG, with Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting Counsel. CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE ORDER 04.03.2026
Mr. Mohsin Qadiri, learned Sr. AAG, appearing for the respondents has raised an issue regarding the maintainability of this appeal filed under Section 21 of NIA Act, 2008 on the ground that the order impugned is appealable under Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. (“UAPA”).
Confronted with this situation, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal so as to enable the appellant to prefer an appeal against the Order dated 16th May,2 025 passed by the court of Special Judge, Unlawful Activities Prevention Act in terms of UAP Act. Ordered, accordingly.
Dismissed as withdrawn in the aforesaid terms. (RAJNESH OSWAL) (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE SRINAGAR 04.03.2026 “Shamim Dar” Whether the order is reportable? No
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.