Others National Investigation Agency (NIA), New Delhi & Anr. v. HON
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
Outcome
Withdrawn
Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn and
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120B, 121A, 122
- NIA Act, 2008 s. 21
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL Cril. Rev. P. No. 20 of 2023 Athokpam Kajit @ Kishorjit and 2 Others National Investigation Agency (NIA), New Delhi and Another Vs. Respondents Petitioners HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL BEFORE
Operative part
23.11.2023 [1] Mr. N. Jonny Meetei, learned counsel, appears on behalf of the revision petitioners and Mr. Kh. Samarjit, learned DSGI, appears on behalf of the respondents. [2] The present petition has been filed praying as follows :
In the premises aforementioned, it is, most respectfully prayed that Your Lordships may most graciously be pleased to : (i) admit the Revision Petition; (ii) call all the connected records from the court below Hon’ble Special Judge (NIA), Manipur; (iii) quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 24/10/2023, passed in Cril. Misc. Case No. 199 of 2023, [Ref:- FIR No. 1234 (9) 2023 PRT- PS in c/w NIA Case No. RC-23/2023/NIA/DLI, U/s 120B/121A/122 IPC, 18/18B/39 UA(P) Act] by the Hon’ble Special Judge (NIA), Manipur; (iv) to pass an interim order for allowing the petitioners to appear through the medium of electronic video linkage/video conferencing 2 mode before the Hon’ble Special NIA Court, Patiala House Court at New Delhi, during pendency of the case; (v) to pass an interim stayed of the impugned order dated 24/10/2023, passed in Cril. Misc. Case No. 199 of 2023, [Ref:- FIR No. 1234 (9) 2023 PRT- PS in c/w NIA Case No. RC-23/2023/NIA/DLI, U/s 120B/121A/122 IPC, 18/18B/39 UA(P) Act] by the Hon’ble Special Judge (NIA), Manipur during pendency of the case; (vi) any other order or direction, which the Hon’ble High Court deems fit, proper and just in the nature of the present case. AND (vii) award cost of this petition.
[3] After some argument and in view of the express provision of Section 21 of the NIA Act, 2008, Mr. N. Jonny Meetei, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the revision petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this Criminal Revision Petition with liberty to initiate appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. Leave and liberty granted. Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn and CHIEF JUSTICE [4] [5]
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn and
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120B, 121A, 122; NIA Act, 2008 — s. 21.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.