MUSHTAQ AHMAD RATHER v. OFFICER
Judgment
Mr. Faheem Nissar Shah, GA with Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting Counsel HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE O R D E R 09.10.2024 Statement of facts/compliance report has been filed. Today when the matter was taken up, no one appeared for the petitioner. Same was the position on the last three consecutive dates of hearings i.e., 08.07.2024, 07.08.2024 and 09.09.2024 which suggests that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter or might his grievances have been redressed. Same is accordingly dismissed for non- prosecution. Contempt proceedings initiated against respondents are accordingly dropped. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (M.A. CHOWDHARY) JUDGE (TASHI RABSTAN) CHIEF JUSTICE SRINAGAR 09.10.2024 Shameem H. Shameem Hamid Mir 2024.10.14 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.