Baldwin Farm Area High School v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. for. Kamlesh/ I. A. No. 5693 of 2024 stands disposed of as not pressed (Sanjay Prasad, J.) 1
Judgment
Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Labour Commissioner-cum-Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum 3. The Labour Commissioner-cum-Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Ranchi 4. Smt. Payal Bhattacharya ----- Respondents …… CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner For the State For the Resp. No. 4 : Mr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Advocate : Mrs. Vandana Singh, Sr. SC-III Ms. Apoorva Singh, AC to Sr. SC-III : Mr. Bhanu Kumar, Advocate Mrs. Bharti Kumari, Advocate …… 05/18.07.2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present W. P. (L). No. 7039 of 2023 and also informed that the amount in question has already been deposited before the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Jamshedpur.
#2. No objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the State and the learned counsel for the private respondent.
#3. In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this W. P. (L). No. 7039 of 2023.
#4. Accordingly, the instant W. P. (L). No. 7039 of 2023 is dismissed as withdrawn and stands disposed of.
#5. for. Kamlesh/ I. A. No. 5693 of 2024 stands disposed of as not pressed (Sanjay Prasad, J.) 1
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.