Shambhu Kumar Barnwal v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, NAVNEET KUMAR
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed and as such disposed of.
Judgment
2.
The State of Jharkhand Sujata Kumari aged about 30 years D/o Bhim Modi Resident of Rani Bazar, Rajendra Nagar, PO – Katras, PS Katras, Dist- Dhanbad. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police Near General Post Office, Kasturba Nagar. PO- Kasturba Nagar, PS- Dhanbad Dist-Dhanbad … … Respondents -----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVNEET KUMAR -------- For the Petitioner For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Shambhu Nath Tiwari, Advocate : Mr. Mithilesh Singh, Advocate Order No. 09/ Dated: 17th December, 2024 -------- Mr. Shambhu Nath Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court not to press the instant writ petition, therefore, submission has been made that whatever the defect is there, the same may be ignored.
Such submission has been made in presence of learned counsel appearing for the respondent(s).
3. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, the defect so pointed out is being ignored, considering the fact that the writ petitioner does not intend to press the instant writ petition.
Operative part
Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed and as such disposed of.
Pending IAs, if any, stands also disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Navneet Kumar, J.) Basant/S.Das
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.