✦ Jharkhand High Court

Kamdhanu Complex, Sonar Gali, Upper Bazar, Ranchi v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.

C) No. 283 of 2022SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Kiran Devi Modi, wife of Late Suresh Kumar Modi, Agrasen Path, Bhuntia Toli, Upper Bazar, Ranchi ... ... Petitioners Ranchi Municipal Corporation and another … ... Respondents Versus -2- With W.P. (C) No. 290 of 2022 (with I.A. No. 721 of 2022) Bajoria Trade…

Judgment

W.P. (C) No. 287 of 2022 (with I.A. No. 715 of 2022) Sri. Dwarkadhish Vastralaya @ Dwarkadhish Vastralaya, Kunj Lal Street, Upper Bazar, Ranchi, through ... its Partner Brajesh Kumar Jalan … ... Petitioner Ranchi Municipal Corporation and another … ... Respondents Versus With W.P. (C) No. 288 of 2022 (with I.A. No. 718 of 2022) Modi Sons, Randhir Prasad Street, Upper Bazar, Ranchi, through its Director, Shyam Sunder Modi ... Petitioner Versus Ranchi Municipal Corporation and another … ... Respondents With W.P. (C) No. 289 of 2022 (with I.A. No. 720 of 2022)

1.

Nani Steel, Suresh Babu Street, Upper Bazar, Ranchi through its Partner Saket Modi

Operative part

2.

Kiran Devi Modi, wife of Late Suresh Kumar Modi, Agrasen Path, Bhuntia Toli, Upper Bazar, Ranchi ... ... Petitioners Ranchi Municipal Corporation and another … ... Respondents Versus -2- With W.P. (C) No. 290 of 2022 (with I.A. No. 721 of 2022) Bajoria Trade Centre, Marwari Tola, Gandhi Chowk, Upper Bazar, Ranchi through its Karta namely ... Arun Kumar Bajoria … … … ... Petitioner Versus Ranchi Municipal Corporation and another … ... Respondents With W.P. (C) No. 291 of 2022 (with I.A. No. 722 of 2022) Bijay Kumar and Brothers, Randhir Prasad Street, Upper Bazar, Ranchi through its Partner Rajeev Kumar Modi… Petitioner Versus Ranchi Municipal Corporation and another … ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD For the Petitioners: --------- Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate Mr. Amritansh Vats, Advocate For the Respondents: None. --------- Oral Order 03/Dated: 01.02.2022 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the petitioners. Mr. Jyoti Kumar, Assistant Municipal Commissioner, Ranchi Municipal Corporation is also present before this Court through video conferencing mode. In view of the fact that the Municipal Building Tribunal, Jharkhand (Appellate Tribunal) has already heard the matter on the point of stay, the learned counsels appearing for the petitioners are not pressing these writ petitions. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed. As a consequence thereof, respective Interlocutory Applications stand disposed of. Manoj/Saket (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, C.J.) (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Jharkhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. C) No. 283 of 2022). ← Search more judgments