✦ Jharkhand High Court

Satish Pal v. The State of Jharkhand

JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 919 of 2026RAJESH KUMAR3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The present writ petition stands disposed of directing the concerned

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Heard the parties. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- A. For commanding upon the respondents especially Respondent No.-2 to 4 restraining Respondent No.-5 from illegally constructing house and other concrete structures over the land of the petitioner measuring to…
  • Para 88. With above observation, the present writ petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.)

Judgment

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR .... For the Petitioner For the State 02/12.02.2026 : Mr. Sanjeev Thakur Adv. : Mr. Jagat Kr. Soni, Adv. : Mr. M.K.Dubey, AC to AG ....

2.

Heard the parties. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- A. For commanding upon the respondents especially Respondent No.-2 to 4 restraining Respondent No.-5 from illegally constructing house and other concrete structures over the land of the petitioner measuring to an area of 88.5 decimals out of total area of 3.54 Acres which the petitioner obtained vide Order dated 17/08/2024, Decree dated 27/08/2024 passed in Original Suit No.-140/2021 by the Court of Learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division)-I, Dumka (Annexure-1). B. A writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding upon the respondents especially Respondent No.-2 to pass appropriate Order upon Application dated 24/06/2025 (Annexure-3) filed by the petitioner pursuant to Report submitted by the Circle Inspector to the Circle Officer dated 17/02/2025 (Annexure-2) as till date no action has been taken by the respondent authorities to the best of the knowledge of the petitioner. C. A writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding upon the respondents especially Respondent No.-3 to immediately pass appropriate Order upon the Application filed by the petitioner registered as Application No.- 91/2025 dated 11/07/2025 (Annexure-4) as till date no action has been taken by the concerned authority upon the same to the best of the knowledge of the petitioner. D. A writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding upon the respondents especially Respondent No.-4 to allot a Government "AMIN" for proper demarcation of land pursuant to the Order dated 17/08/2024, Decree dated 27/08/2024 passed in Original Suit No.-140/2021 by the Court of Learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division)-I, Dumka, as illegal construction is being carried out by Respondent No.-5 over the land of petitioner and different applications/representations has been filed in that connection but till date the respondent authorities are sitting tight over the matter for the reasons best known to them. E. During the pendency of the instant Writ petition Status Quo be maintained by the concerned authorities especially Respondent No.-3 & 4.” It is a private dispute in nature. A complaint has been made that the S.D.O., Dumka is not entertaining

4.

his application made under Section 144 of the Cr.P.C. (now Section 163 of BNSS, 2023).

5.

In view of the limited prayer, no notice is required to be issued to the private respondent.

Operative part

6.

The present writ petition stands disposed of directing the concerned authority to act in accordance with law.

7.

It is hereby clarified that any appropriate application made in accordance with law has to be accepted by the authority and he is duty bound to proceed and dispose of the same in accordance with law.

8.

With above observation, the present writ petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.)

12.02.2026 Shahid/ Uploaded on 13.02.2026 2 W.P.(C) No.919 of 2026

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The present writ petition stands disposed of directing the concerned

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 144; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 163.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Jharkhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 919 of 2026). ← Search more judgments