✦ Jharkhand High Court

Deo Kumar Pandit @ Leda Pandit v. The State of Jharkhand

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Case journey

Linked proceedings

Earlier proceedings, if any, are not linked in the corpus
Jharkhand High CourtDate not recorded
Deo Kumar Pandit @ Leda Pandit v. The State of JharkhandThis judgment
Linked automatically · not yet reviewed
Supreme Court of IndiaDate not recorded
RAMENDRA@ RAMAN DHULDHUE v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Criminal Appeal No. 56 of 2013

Built from judgments in the Courts & Cases corpus and the links detected in their text. Coverage is incomplete — earlier or later proceedings may be missing, so verify against the official record. How Case Journey works

Judgment

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner For the State ------ : : ------ Mr. S.P. Roy, Advocate A.P.P. 6/ 12.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the Judgment dated 3.6.2013 passed by learned In-charge, Sessions Judge, Godda, in Criminal Appeal No. 56 of 2013, whereby the appeal filed against the order dated 21.5.2013 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Godda, in G.R. No. 808 of 2012, rejecting the bail application of the juvenile-petitioner, has been dismissed by the learned Appellate Court below. The petitioner has been made accused in Mahagama P.S. Case No. 90 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 808 of 2012, for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to robbery and four persons are named in the FIR. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The petitioner, however, was declared to be a juvenile and he filed his application for bail, which was rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board and the appeal filed against the same was also dismissed by learned Appellate Court below stating that the petitioner was identified in test identification parade. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Deo Kumar Pandit @ Leda Pandit, being a juvenile, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Godda, in connection with G.R. No. 808 of 2012 arising out of Mahagama P.S. Case No. 90 of 2012, with the condition that one of the bailers should be the father of the petitioner and he shall give an undertaking in the Court below that he shall keep the juvenile-petitioner under his personal care and protection and no repetition of such offence shall be made by the petitioner. This application is accordingly, allowed. R.Kr. ( H. C. Mishra, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Jharkhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT RANCHI CR. REVISION No. 565 of 2013). ← Search more judgments