✦ Jharkhand High Court

Ranjit Rana @ Ranjeet Rana v. The State of Jharkhand

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner For the State :Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo :A. P.P. 02/07.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for ----- the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 376, 511 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Chouparan P.S. Case No. 236 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 4523 of 2012 (S. T. No. 17 of 2013). There is allegation against the petitioner to have attempted to commit rape upon the informant, but the F.I.R. clearly shows that the rape was actually not committed upon the informant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Ranjit Rana @ Ranjeet Rana is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh, in connection with Chouparan P.S. Case No. 236 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 4523 of 2012, S. T. No. 17 of 2013. Umesh/- (H. C. Mishra, J)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Jharkhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 1142 of 2013). ← Search more judgments