Tata Steel Limited, an existing company within the meaning of Companies v. Damodar Valley Corporation
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR
Provisions considered
Judgment
---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioners For the Respondents 07/Dated: 27th July, 2023 : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv. Mr. Saket Upadhyay, Adv. : Mr. Srijit Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Tanya Rai, Adv. ----
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition as regulatory commission has jurisdiction over the issue raised in the present writ petition.
Learned counsel for the other side has no objection. In view of above submission, the present writ petitions are, hereby, disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the regulatory commission and the regulatory commission is directed to decide the issue in accordance with law. Amar/- (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.