Sudesh Kumar Singh and Co. Construction Pvt. Ltd. a company registered v. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K VINOD CHANDRAN, PARTHA SARTHY
Outcome
Withdrawn
petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 1010. Alok Kumar Singh, Son of Late Ranjit Singh, Resident of Village-Kathar, P.O. Arak, P.S. Krishnabraham, District-Buxar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocate Mr.…
Judgment
Versus The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. The Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. The Engineer in Chief, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. The Technical Bid Evaluation Committee Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. The Secretary to Engineer in Chief, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. The Engineer in Chief cum Additional Commissioner cum Special Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
Patna High Court CWJC No.11358 of 2024(4) dt.11-09-2024
The Chief Engineer-3, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. The Executive Engineer, Works Circle, Munger, Rural Works Department, Munger.
Nodal Officer, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
Operative part
Alok Kumar Singh, Son of Late Ranjit Singh, Resident of Village-Kathar, P.O. Arak, P.S. Krishnabraham, District-Buxar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocate Mr. Standing Counsel (9) : : ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 4 11-09-2024 At the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Neha/- U
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Companies Act, 2013; Indian Partnership Act, 1932.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.