Sujan Hembram v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 407, 408, 420
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The present anticipatory bail application is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Ritesh/ (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 2 A.B.A. No. 2315 of 2024
Judgment
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioners : Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. Order No. 08 Dated: 04.12.2024 The petitioners apprehending their arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 420/407/408 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Barhait P.S. Case No. 30 of 2023 pending in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj, have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.
#2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that it is a case under Sections 420/407/408 of the Indian Penal Code, the sentences for which are up to 07 years, as well as keeping in view the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and Another reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273, particularly paragraph no. 12 of the same, followed by the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. reported in 2022 (10) SCC 51 as well as the observation made in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. reported in 2024 (9) SCC 198, without commenting on the merit of the present case, the petitioners are directed to appear and seek regular bail before the concerned Trial Court within three weeks, which shall be disposed of by the said court in strict compliance of the guidelines laid down in the aforesaid cases.
#3. The present anticipatory bail application is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Ritesh/ (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 2 A.B.A. No. 2315 of 2024
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.