✦ Jharkhand High Court

Shishir Thakur v. The State of Jharkhand

JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A No. 3417 of 2024RAJESH SHANKAR

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. The present anticipatory bail application is, accordingly, disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Vikas/ (Rajesh Shankar, J.) -2- A.B.A. No.3417 of 2024

Judgment

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : For the State : For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari, Advocate Mr. Naveen Kr. Gaunjhu, A.P.P. None ----- Order No.06 Date: 20.12.2024

1.

The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Chandankiyari (Amalabad OP) P.S. Case No.82 of 2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 419/420/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

2.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that it is a case under Sections 419/420/ 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, the maximum sentence for which is up to 7 years as well as keeping in view the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of “Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Another reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273” , particularly paragraph no.12 of the same, followed by the judgement rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of “Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.” reported in 2022 (10) SCC 51 as well as the observation made in the case of “Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.” reported in 2024 (9) SCC 198, without commenting on the merit of the present case, the petitioner is directed to appear and seek regular bail before the concerned Trial Court within three weeks, which shall be disposed of by the said Court in strict compliance of the guidelines laid down in the aforesaid cases.

3.

The present anticipatory bail application is, accordingly, disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Vikas/ (Rajesh Shankar, J.) -2- A.B.A. No.3417 of 2024

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Jharkhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A No. 3417 of 2024). ← Search more judgments