✦ Himachal Pradesh High Court · 11 Aug 2026

NIC Ltd v. Shakuntla Devi FAO (MV) No.182 of 2024 & CO No.12 of 2022 & Ors.

MV) No. 182 of 2024SUSHIL KUKREJA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

application is dismissed as withdrawn

Judgment

Operative part

11.08.2026 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for respondent No.1/Cross-objector. Respondents No.2 & 3 already ex-parte. CMP No.10296/2026 in FAO(MV) No.182/2024 At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant/ respondent No.1 seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this application. Hence, in view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the applicant/respondent No.1, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn. August 11, 2026 (V.Himalvi) ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: application is dismissed as withdrawn

Which court decided this case, and when?

Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 11 Aug 2026. The bench was SUSHIL KUKREJA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Himachal Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. MV) No. 182 of 2024). ← Search more judgments