✦ Himachal Pradesh High Court

Judgment · High Court

V K AHUJA

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, with Mr.Varun Chandel, Advocate, for the respondents. CWP No.2543 of 2009. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that since this matter pertains to the Armed Forces and this Court cannot pursue the matter according to Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, therefore, it may be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal at Chandigarh. In view of the above submissions, the petition is forwarded to the Armed Forces Tribunal at Chandigarh. A copy of the writ petition be retained for record in the Registry. August 31, 2011. (tilak) (V.K. Ahuja), J.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Himachal Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments