Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Therefore, this writ petition is allowed to be dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Wakf Act, 1995 s. 83
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 3 Mr. B. S. Attri, Advocate for respondent No.2. It has been brought to our notice by the learned counsel for respondent No.2 that the Tribunals, as indicated in Section 83 Chapter 8 of The Wakf Act, 1995, have already been constituted and are functional and the grievance of the petitioners is to be considered by the said Tribunals. In view of the facts and circumstances, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the Tribunal for redressal of their grievance, if so advised. However, this Court is not inclined to give any relief. Therefore, this writ petition is allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the dismissal by way of withdrawn shall not affect the rights of the petitioners in any manner. CMP No. 1148/2008 In view of the dismissal of the main matter, this application also stands dismissed. ( R. B. Misra ), J. ( Sanjay Karol ), J. May 19, 2008 (rana)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Therefore, this writ petition is allowed to be dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Wakf Act, 1995 — s. 83.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.