Judgment · High Court · 2022
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. COMMANDER WORKS ENGINEER, MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, JUTOGH CANTT. SHIMLA, H.P. (SH. BALRAM SHARMA, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) .....RESPONDENTS ____________________________________________________ 2 This petition coming on for admission this day, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq, passed following: O R D E R Learned counsel for…
Judgment
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 1097 of 2022 Between:- SH. SURINDER SINGH, S/O LATE SH. BIR SINGH, AGED 63 YEARS, R/O MAHINDRA NIWAS, NEAR MES PUMP HOUSE, JUTOGH CANTT., SHIMLA H.P. (BY SH. VAIBHAV TANWAR, ADVOCATE) …..PETITIONER AND
#1. UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI.
#2. COMMANDER WORKS ENGINEER, MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, JUTOGH CANTT. SHIMLA, H.P. (SH. BALRAM SHARMA, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) .....RESPONDENTS ____________________________________________________ 2 This petition coming on for admission this day, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq, passed following: O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the learned Central Administrative Tribunal. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of accordingly. ( Mohammad Rafiq ) Chief Justice ( Jyotsna Rewal Dua ) Judge 16th March 2022 (rohit)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as
Which court decided this case, and when?
Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 16 Mar 2022. The bench was JYOTSNA REWAL DUA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.