Judgment · High Court · 2008
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Both the applications are disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
28.3.2008 and for this purpose the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed separate application, under Section 151 C.P.C. for taking on record the fact that now 28.3.2008 is the date of hearing before the Arbitral Tribunal. This application is taken on record and be registered. -2- Arb. Case No. 12/2002. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed. The witness mentioned in para-4 of the application alongwith record be summoned with a direction to appear before the Arbitral Tribunal, Superintending Engineer (Arbitration) HPPWD, Solan on
28.3.2008 at 11.00 a.m. Steps be taken within two days and thereafter dasti summons be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner by the Registry. Both the applications are disposed of. March 18, 2008. (Hem) ( Kuldip Singh ), Judge.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Both the applications are disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 27; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 18 Mar 2008. The bench was KULDIP SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.