Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K SURENDER
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, this Writ Miscellaneous Petition is allowed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
W.M.P.(MD) No.22429 of 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 03.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDERW.M.P.(MD) No.22429 of 2025inW.P.(MD) No.25064 of 20251.D.Ramesh2.Vinoth Kumari3.Ravichandran... PetitionersVs.
Parthipan2.The District Collector, Dindigul District.
The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Dindigul District.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
The Assistant Director of Land Surveys, Dindigul District.
The Tahsildar, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.... Respondents_____________Page No. 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.M.P.(MD) No.22429 of 2025 Prayer : Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to implead the petitioners as the sixth to eighth respondents in W.P.(MD) No.25064 of 2025.For Petitioners: Mr.V.SukumarFor R1: Mr.S.BalajiFor R2 to R6: Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader*****
Operative part
O R D E R This Writ Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to implead the petitioners herein as the sixth to eighth respondents in the above Writ Petition.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Miscellaneous Petition, the petitioners are impleaded as the sixth to eighth respondents in the above Writ Petition.3. Registry is directed to make necessary amendments in the cause title._____________Page No. 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.M.P.(MD) No.22429 of 20254. Accordingly, this Writ Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.[K.SURENDER, J.] 03.02.2026 JEN_____________Page No. 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.M.P.(MD) No.22429 of 2025K.SURENDER , J. JENW.M.P.(MD) No.22429 of 2025inW.P.(MD) No.25064 of 2025 03.02.2026(2/2)_____________Page No. 4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Miscellaneous Petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.