G.Sudha Ramasamy v. The District Collector, Theni, Theni District.2.The Assistant Director and The District Collector
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
W.P.(MD) No.11347 of 2024BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 25.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDERW.P.(MD) No.11347 of 2024andW.M.P.(MD) No.10091 of 2024G.Sudha Ramasamy... PetitionerVs.
The District Collector, Theni, Theni District.
The Assistant Director and The District Collector Personal Assistant (Land – Survey), The District Land Survey Office, Theni District.
The Tahsildar, Bodinayakannur Taluk, Theni District.
The Taluk Surveyor, Bodinayakannur Taluk, Theni District.
The Inspector of Police, Kurangani Police Station, Theni District.
Vigneswara Vijayram... Respondents _____________Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.11347 of 2024 Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the third to fifth respondents from conducting survey the land and installing stone on the boundaries of property in Survey Nos.1078/1b and 1078/2 in Kottakudi village, Bodinayakanur taluk, Theni in guise of Survey Notice dated 15.05.2024.For Petitioner: No appearanceFor R1 to R5: Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government PleaderFor R6: No appearance*****
Operative part
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the third to fifth respondents from conducting a survey of the land and installing boundary stones in respect of the property comprised in Survey Nos.1078/1B and 1078/2 at Kottakudi Village, Bodinayakanur Taluk, Theni District, under the guise of the Survey Notice dated 15.05.2024. 2. There is no representation for the petitioner and the sixth respondent._____________Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.11347 of 20243. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first to fifth respondents would submit that the survey has already been conducted. He has also produced a copy of the survey report of the fourth respondent.4. In view of the above, no cause survives in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.[K.SURENDER, J.] 25.02.2026 JENIndex : Yes / NoNeutral Citation : Yes / NoTo1.The District Collector, Theni, Theni District. 2. The Assistant Director and The District Collector Personal Assistant (Land – Survey), The District Land Survey Office, Theni District. 3. The Tahsildar, Bodinayakannur Taluk, Theni District._____________Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.11347 of 20244.The Taluk Surveyor, Bodinayakannur Taluk, Theni District. 5. The Inspector of Police, Kurangani Police Station, Theni District._____________Page No. 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.11347 of 2024K.SURENDER , J. JENW.P.(MD) No.11347 of 2024 25.02.2026_____________Page No. 5 of 5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.