Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K SURENDER
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
W.P.(MD)No.21470 of 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED :28.01.2026CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDERW.P.(MD)No.21470 of 2025 Naziruddin ... PetitionerVs1. The District Collector, Trichy, Trichy District..
The District Revenue Officer,O/o the District Revenue Office, Trichy, Trichy District..
The Revenue Divisional Officer,O/o the Revenue Divisional Office, Thottiyam, Trichy District..
The Thasildar,O/o the Thasildar Office, Thottiyam Taluk, Thottiyam Town, Trichy, Trichy District..
Imthiyaz Ali,S/o Late. Abdul Raseeth, Opp to Thottiam Govt High School, Kosawampatti Road, Thottiam Post, Trichy District.. ... Respondents1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.21470 of 2025PRAYER :-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to mutate the patta in respect of Old Survey No. 81/62 and present Survey Number SF No. 81/3/8 to an extent of 5000 Sq.ft situated at Kattupudur South, Thottiyam Taluk, Trichy District in favour of the petitioner and by considering the petitioners representations dt. 17.06.2025, 18.06.2025 and 19.06.2025 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr.A.Nawazhan for M/s.Ajmal AssociatesFor Respondents: Mr.R.Ragavendran for R1 to R4Government AdvocateMr.S.Arjun for R5
Operative part
O R D E RThis writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 3 and 4 to mutate the patta in respect of Old Survey No. 81/62 and present Survey Number SF No. 81/3/8 to an extent of 5000 sq.ft situated at Kattupudur South, Thottiyam Taluk, Trichy District in favour of the petitioner and by considering the petitioner's representations dated 17.06.2025, 18.06.2025 and 19.06.2025 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate for the official respondents and the learned 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.21470 of 2025counsel appearing for the private respondent. 3. The learned Government Advocate submits that patta has already been issued and the cause does not survive any more. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. (K.SURENDER, J) 28.01.2026NCC:Yes/NoIndex: Yes/NoRRTo1. The District Collector, Trichy, Trichy District..2. The District Revenue Officer,O/o the District Revenue Office, Trichy, Trichy District..3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,O/o the Revenue Divisional Office, Thottiyam, Trichy District..4. The Thasildar,O/o the Thasildar Office, Thottiyam Taluk, Thottiyam Town, Trichy, Trichy District..3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.21470 of 2025K.SURENDER, J. RRW.P.(MD)No.21470 of 202528.01.20264/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.