✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

R VIJAYAKUMAR

Case at a glance

Bench
R VIJAYAKUMAR

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Marimuthu, District Educational Officer, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District. Now Jurisdiction Changed to The District Educational Officer, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District. ... Contemnors / Respondents 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P(MD).No.1298 of 2024PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the…

Judgment

Cont P(MD).No.1298 of 2024BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 18.11.2025 CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMARCONT.P(MD)No.1298 of 2024inW.P(MD) No. 8985 of 2023S.Sironmony ... Petitioner/Petitioner- Vs-1. Kumaraguru Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.

Arivozhi The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

3.

Marimuthu, District Educational Officer, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District. Now Jurisdiction Changed to The District Educational Officer, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District. ... Contemnors / Respondents 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P(MD).No.1298 of 2024PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents herein for their wilful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P(MD) No.8985 of 2023, dated 20.11.2023. For Petitioner: Mr.T.Cibi Chakraborthy For Respondents: Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam Government Advocate ORDERThe present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging violation of the orders of this Court dated 20.11.2023 made in W.P(MD) No.8985 of 2023, wherein this Court has directed the authorities to approve the appointment of the writ petitioner w.e.f.01.04.2002.2. In compliance of the order of this Court, a proceedings has been issued on 06.11.2025, granting approval w.e.f.01.04.2002. The grievance of the petitioner is that the monetary benefits have not been released. 3. In view of the above, the authorities are directed to release the monetary benefits under the old pension scheme within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case of non 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P(MD).No.1298 of 2024compliance of the order of this Court, the petitioner is at liberty to revive the contempt proceedings. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition stands closed. 18.11.2025Index: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoNCC: Yes/NoebsiTo1. The Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.2. The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.3. The District Educational Officer, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District. Now Jurisdiction Changed to The District Educational Officer, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P(MD).No.1298 of 2024R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.ebsi CONT.P(MD)No.1298 of 2024inW.P(MD) No.8985 of 202318.11.2025 4/4

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments