Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
W.P.(MD) No.1849 of 2021BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 19.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDERW.P.(MD) No.1849 of 20211.T.Ganesan2.A.Mallika3.S.Geethamani4.P.Nallammal5.P.Amudha6.K.Mookayi7.C.Pushpavalli 8.C.Philominal 9. Palaniyammal10.S.Lakshmanan11.M.Subramani12.C.Kuzhandairaj13.Vadagiri14.Ennasimuthu15.Karuppaiya_____________Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.1849 of 202116.M.Balamuthu17.R.Thomas18.V.Jeyaseeli 19.C.Devi20.N.Rethinam21.Parameswari22.T.Pappathi23.S.Packiyam... PetitionersVs.
The Commissioner, Urban Land Ceiling and Regularization, Chepauk, Chennai- 600 005.
The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District.
The Assistant Commissioner, Urban Land Ceiling and Land Tax, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District.
The Tahsildar, Tiruchirappalli East Taluk, Trichy District.
M/s. The Amalgamated Coalfields Limited, Rep. by its authorized signatory Mr.C.Sitaram_____________Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.1849 of 2021 Having its office at K.Sathanur Village K.K.Nagar, Trichy.... Respondents[R5 is substituted vide order dated.27.11.2023 passed in W.M.P.(MD).3319 of 2021]Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allot Housing Plot to an extent of 2400 Sq.ft to each petitioner at S.Nos.128/2, 129, 130 to an extent of 30 Acres and 86 Cent belonging to Sree Sabari Mills situated at Kottapattu Village and consequently directing the fourth respondent to issue patta in the petitioners’ names by considering the petitioners’ representation dated 09.03.2020.For Petitioners: No appearanceFor R1 to R4: Mr.S.Kameswaran Government AdvocateFor R5: Mr.R.Subramanian*****
Operative part
O R D E RWhen the case was taken up for hearing on 05.01.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the case was directed to be listed on 20.01.2026, i.e., today, under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. _____________Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.1849 of 20212. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. [K.SURENDER, J.] 19.01.2026 JENIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / NoNeutral Citation : Yes / NoTo1.The Commissioner, Urban Land Ceiling and Regularization, Chepauk, Chennai- 600 005. 2. The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District. 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Urban Land Ceiling and Land Tax, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District. 4. The Tahsildar, Tiruchirappalli East Taluk, Trichy District._____________Page No. 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.1849 of 2021K.SURENDER , J. JENW.P.(MD) No.1849 of 2021 19.01.2026_____________Page No. 5 of 5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.