✦ Madras High Court · 01 Jun 2026

The Secretary v. The Commissioner, Bodinayakanur Municipality,Bodinayakanur,Theni District

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

1 W.P.(MD)NO.9723 OF 2022BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 01.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN ANDTHE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMAW.P.(MD)No.9723 of 2022andW.M.P.(MD)No.6970 & 6972 of 2022The Secretary, ZKM Higher Secondary School, Bodinayakanur, Theni District – 625 501. ... Petitioner Vs.The Commissioner, Bodinayakanur Municipality, Bodinayakanur, Theni District. ... RespondentPrayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the impugned order passed by the respondent in Na.Ka. No.71/2021/F1 dated 06.04.2022 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.V.MuthukamatchiFor Respondent : Mr.A.Kannan * * * 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2 W.P.(MD)NO.9723 OF 2022O R D E R(By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)Heard both sides. 2. The impugned communication calling upon the petitioner to remove the encroachment in question is quashed on the only ground that it was not preceded by show cause notice. The matter is remanded to the respondent. The respondent shall issue notice to the writ petitioner and thereafter, take action in accordance with law. With the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (R.POORNIMA, J.) 01st June 2026 NCC : Yes / NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / NoPMU2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3 W.P.(MD)NO.9723 OF 2022G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ANDR.POORNIMA, J.PMUW.P.(MD)No.9723 of 202201.06.20263/3

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Madras High Court, on 01 Jun 2026. The bench was G R SWAMINATHAN, R POORNIMA, ANDR POORNIMA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments