#T.Vijayakumari v. Ottanchatram, Dindigul District
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
Judgment
!For Petitioner : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh ^For Respondents : Mr.SMS.Johnny Basha :ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
The writ petitioner wants this Court to direct the respondents to shift the transformer that has been installed near the petitioner-s land. This Court cannot direct the respondents to locate the transformer in question at a particular site. It is a matter to be decided entirely by the respondents. However, the respondents can be directed to dispose of the petitioner-s representation dated 01.02.2019 on merits and in accordance with law.
Operative part
With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Madras High Court, on 21 Nov 2002. The bench was G R SWAMINATHAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.