Judgment · High Court · 2026
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
With the aforesaid liberty and observation, this writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
1 W.P.(MD)NO.9793 OF 2022BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 01.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN ANDTHE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMAW.P.(MD)No.9793 of 2022andW.M.P.(MD)No.7009 of 2022S.Elangovan ... Petitioner Vs.1. The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District. 2. The Block Development Officer, O/o.the Anthanallur Block Development Office, Srirangam, Tiruchirappalli District. 3. The Uthamarseeli Village Panchayat, Rep. By its President, Uthamarseeli Village, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, forbearing the third respondent not to remove the petitioner from the land in survey No.241 situated at Uthamarseeli Village, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2 W.P.(MD)NO.9793 OF 2022For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Mohan GandhiFor Respondents : Mr.M.P.Senthil, Government Advocate for R-1. Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam for R-2. Mr.V.Karuna for R-3. * * * O R D E R(Order of the Court was delivered by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)Heard both sides. 2. The prayer in the writ petition cannot be granted. The only observation we can make is that if the petitioner is in possession of the petition mentioned property and if the petition mentioned property is a Government poramboke, the authorities will have to adopt due process of law before dispossessing the petitioner. With the aforesaid liberty and observation, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (R.POORNIMA, J.) 01st June 2026 NCC : Yes / NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / NoPMU2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3 W.P.(MD)NO.9793 OF 2022To:1. The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District. 2. The Block Development Officer, O/o.the Anthanallur Block Development Office, Srirangam, Tiruchirappalli District. 3. The President, Uthamarseeli Village Panchayat, Uthamarseeli Village, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4 W.P.(MD)NO.9793 OF 2022G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ANDR.POORNIMA, J.PMUW.P.(MD)No.9793 of 202201.06.20264/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid liberty and observation, this writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Madras High Court, on 01 Jun 2026. The bench was G R SWAMINATHAN, R POORNIMA, ANDR POORNIMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.