Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- G R SWAMINATHAN, R POORNIMA
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cont P(MD)No.715 of 2022BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN ANDTHE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMACont P(MD)No.715 of 2022inW.A(MD)No.254 of 20221.O.Selvam2.S.Sivakumar3.M.Indira4.M.Ananth... Petitioners / Appellants 1 to 4 Vs.
P.Naresh, Joint Director of School Education (Personnel), O/o.The Joint Director of School Education, Chennai – 600 006.
C.Karuppasamy, Chief Educational Officer, Dindigul District. Dindigul.
R.Swaminathan, Chief Educational Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P(MD)No.715 of 20224.A.Balu Muthu, Chief Educational Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. ... Contemnors /Respondents 2,3,5 & 7Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempts of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Contemnors for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order dated 25.03.2022 passed by this Court in W.A(MD)No.254 of 2022.For Petitioners : Mr.C.Venkatesh KumarFor Respondents : Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government AdvocateORDER(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.)The learned counsel on either side inform the Court that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. 2. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. [G.R.S., J.] [R.P, J.] 24.03.2026 NCC : Yes / NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes/ NoMGA2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P(MD)No.715 of 2022To1.The Joint Director of School Education (Personnel), O/o.The Joint Director of School Education, Chennai – 600 006.2.The Chief Educational Officer, Dindigul District. Dindigul. 3. The Chief Educational Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.
The Chief Educational Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P(MD)No.715 of 2022 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.AND R.POORNIMA , J. MGACont P(MD)No.715 of 2022inW.A(MD)No.254 of 202224.03.2026 4/4
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.