Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempts of Courts Act, 1971 s. 11
- HR&CE Act, 1959 s. 78
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The only direction given by the Hon'ble Division Bench on 27.08.2024 in W.P(MD)No.19094 of 2024 was to complete the proceedings initiated under Section 78 of the HR&CE Act, 1959. The learned Government Advocate submits that orders have been passed in all the proceedings initiated…
Judgment
Cont P(MD)No.431 of 2026BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN ANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRICont P(MD)No.431 of 2026inW.P(MD)No.19094 of 20241.Ganesan2.Velu3.Pandiarajan ... Petitioners / Petitioners Vs.
J.Kumaragurubaran, I.A.S., Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungampakkam, Chennai. ... 1st Contemnor / 60th Respondent2.Lakshmi Mala, Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Dindigul.... 2nd Contemnor / 4th Respondent1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P(MD)No.431 of 2026 Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempts of Courts Act, 1971 to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnors / respondents 60 and 4 and punish them for the willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P(MD)No.19094 of 2024 dated 27.08.2024.For Petitioners : Mr.C.Mayil Vahana RajendranFor Respondents : Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan Government AdvocateORDER(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan, J.)Heard both sides.
The only direction given by the Hon'ble Division Bench on 27.08.2024 in W.P(MD)No.19094 of 2024 was to complete the proceedings initiated under Section 78 of the HR&CE Act, 1959. The learned Government Advocate submits that orders have been passed in all the proceedings initiated under Section 78 of the Act in the year 2025 itself. It is further submitted that the encroachers have filed either revision petitions before the Commissioner, HR&CE or writ petitions. Since the direction of this Court has been complied with, we are of the view that no contempt has been made out. We would, however, expect 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P(MD)No.431 of 2026the Commissioner, HR&CE to dispose of the revision petitions filed before him within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. This Contempt Petition is closed accordingly. [G.R.S., J.] [L.V.G, J.] 25.03.2026 NCC : Yes / NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes/ NoMGATo1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungampakkam, Chennai. 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Dindigul.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P(MD)No.431 of 2026 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.AND L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J. MGACont P(MD)No.431 of 2026inW.P(MD)No.19094 of 202425.03.2026 4/4
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.