Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- G R SWAMINATHAN, R KALAIMATHI
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cont P(MD)No.729 of 2022BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN ANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHICont P(MD)No.729 of 2022inW.A(MD)No.1287 of 2019V.Muthuvel ... Petitioner / PetitionerVs.Arumugam, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Madurai) Limited, Bye-pass Road, Madurai – 627 016. ... Contemnor / RespondentPrayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, 1971 to punish the contemnor / respondent for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the Order dated 20.11.2019 passed by this court in W.A(MD)No.1287 of 2019.For Petitioner : Mr.M.PounrajFor Respondent : Mr.J.Senthil Kumaraiah Standing Counsel1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P(MD)No.729 of 2022ORDER(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.)Heard both sides.
Paragraph 11 of the affidavit filed by the Management reads as follows:
11.I humbly submit that the respondent take immediate steps to include the period of service from the date of absent (17.03.2012) to the date of labour court award (14.02.2017) and receipt of corresponding employer contribution amount of Rs.4.15 Lakhs, after adjusting the pension arrears.
The pensionary service of the writ petitioner would thus come to 18 years. The Management undertakes to pay pension to the petitioner accordingly.
This Contempt Petition stands closed. [G.R.S., J.] [R.K.M, J.] 06.02.2026 NCC : Yes / NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes/ NoMGA2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P(MD)No.729 of 2022To1.The District Educational Officer, Vallioor – 627 117, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Block Educational Officer, Vallioor – 627 117, Tirunelveli District.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P(MD)No.729 of 2022 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.AND R.KALAIMATHI , J. MGACont P(MD)No.729 of 2022inW.A(MD)No.1287 of 201906.02.2026 4/4
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.