✦ Madras High Court

Sagunthala v. State of Tamil Nadu

S SRIMATHY

Case at a glance

Bench
S SRIMATHY

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. T.N.Sirajdheen ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take action against the respondent No.3 strictly in accordance with the direction of the…

Judgment

W.P.Crl(MD)No.863 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 17.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHYW.P.Crl(MD).No.863 of 2026 Sagunthala ...PetitionerVs.

1.

State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its the Commissioner of Police, Trichy Corporation, Trichy.

2.

State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Trichy, Trichy District.

3.

T.N.Sirajdheen ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take action against the respondent No.3 strictly in accordance with the direction of the Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari Vs Govt. U.P. and another case, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 24.11.2025 within stipulated time fixed by this Court.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl(MD)No.863 of 2026 For Petitioner: Mr.D.R.MurugesanFor Respondents : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.side) (R1 & R2)ORDERThis writ petition is filed for Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.11.2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2.3. This Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs Respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 24.11.2025 and to conduct an inquiry. If any criminal offence is found to have been committed, appropriate action shall be taken against Respondent No.3, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl(MD)No.863 of 2026 4. With these observations, this Writ Petition (Criminal) is disposed of. 17.02.2026NCC : Yes/NoIndex: Yes/No Internet : YesmsrmTo1. The Commissioner of Police, Trichy Corporation, Trichy.2. The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Trichy, Trichy District.3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl(MD)No.863 of 2026 S.SRIMATHY, J.msrmW.P.Crl(MD).No.863 of 202617.02.20264/4

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments