✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

S SRIMATHY

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the petitioner to appear before the 2nd respondent police and cooperate with the investigation. Further, the 2nd respondent is directed to complete the investigation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with…

Judgment

W.P.Crl(MD)No.1237 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHYW.P.Crl(MD).No.1237 of 2026 Rajapandiyan ...PetitionerVs.

1.

The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.

The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Ramanathapuram District. ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take appropriate action on the petitioner's complaint dated 24.02.2026.For Petitioner: Mr.N.Jeyaram SidharthFor Respondents : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.side)1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl(MD)No.1237 of 2026 ORDERThis writ petition is filed for Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to take action against the accused persons based on the petitioner's complaint dated 24.02.2026.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had lodged a complaint before the respondents against the accused persons; however, no action has been taken on the same till date.

3.

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner's representation has been taken and notice was issued to the petitioner to appear before the 2nd respondent and to co-operate with the investigation.

4.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the petitioner to appear before the 2nd respondent police and cooperate with the investigation. Further, the 2nd respondent is directed to complete the investigation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl(MD)No.1237 of 2026 order.5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition (Criminal) is disposed of. 27.02.2026NCC : Yes/NoIndex: Yes/No Internet : YesmsrmTo1. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Ramanathapuram District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl(MD)No.1237 of 2026 S.SRIMATHY, J.msrmW.P.Crl(MD).No.1237 of 202627.02.20264/4

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments