Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S SRIMATHY
Outcome
Disposed of
Recording the abovesaid submission, this Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. A.Selvi,6. T.Mangayarkarasi,1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.712 of 20267. Sivakami, 8. M.Murugan, ... RespondentsPRAYER :- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to issue necessary direction to the 4th respondent…
Judgment
WP CRL.(MD). No.712 of 2026BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 16.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHYW.P.Crl. (MD). No.712 of 2026 Subramanian, ... PetitionerVs.
The District General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road, Mayilapur, Chennai.
The Superintendent of Police,,Madurai District, Madurai.
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti-Land Grabbing Special Cell, Madurai.
State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch,, Madurai District, Madurai..
Operative part
A.Selvi,6. T.Mangayarkarasi,1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.712 of 20267. Sivakami, 8. M.Murugan, ... RespondentsPRAYER :- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to issue necessary direction to the 4th respondent to take appropriate action as against respondents 3 to 8 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 21.02.2025 made to the 1st respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S. Bala Karthick, For Respondents : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 to R4ORDERThis writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to issue necessary direction to the 4th respondent to take appropriate action as against respondents 3 to 8 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 21.02.2025 made to the 1st respondent.2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.712 of 2026petitioner's complaint was already been taken and after enquiry, it was closed.3. Recording the abovesaid submission, this Petition is disposed of. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the closure report. 16.02.2026LS TO1. The District General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road, Mayilapur, Chennai.2. The Superintendent of Police,,Madurai District, Madurai. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti-Land Grabbing Special Cell, Madurai.4. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch,, Madurai District, Madurai.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.712 of 2026 S.SRIMATHY,J. LS W.P.Crl. (MD) No.712 of 2026 16.02.20264/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the abovesaid submission, this Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.