S.Ravirathinam v. 1.A.Lakshmi2.The State
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Crl.M.P.No.183 of 2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 12.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANCrl.M.P.No.183 of 2026in Crl.R.C.No.2712 of 2025S.Ravirathinam ..Petitioner-Vs-1.A.Lakshmi2.The State rep by The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Metro 2, Chennai ...RespondentsPRAYER: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to implead the petitioner as the second respondent the above Criminal Revision. For Petitioner: Mr.R.Thenamirtha Shyamala For Respondent: Mr.P.K.Ganesh for R1Mr.S.Balaji, GA for R2ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to implead the petitioner as the second respondent in the Revision.1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.183 of 2026SUNDER MOHAN, J.,vkr2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the averments made in the affidavit, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.4. Call the Revision on 05.02.2026. 12.01.2026vkrNote: Registry is directed to make necessary amendment in the cause title. To1.The Metropolitan Magistrate, CCB-CBCID, Egmore, Chennai. Crl.M.P.No.183 of 2026in Crl.R.C.No.2712 of 20252/2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.