S.Mubarak v. Canara BankRep. by its Authorised Officer Peelamedu BranchPVG Towers TextilesPeelamedu, Coimbatore District
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUNDER MOHAN, USTICE
Outcome
Dismissed
Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Today also, no one appears for petitioner. Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim applications are also dismissed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J) 21.08.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Nokpl____________Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis…
Judgment
W.P.No.26893 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21.08.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANW.P.No.26893 of 2025&W.M.P.Nos.30212 & 30214 of 2025S.Mubarak..PetitionerVs.Canara BankRep. by its Authorised Officer Peelamedu BranchPVG Towers TextilesPeelamedu, Coimbatore District...RespondentPrayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned E-auction notice issued by the respondent dated 09.04.2025 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondent do not take any coercive steps in respect of the petitioner dwelling house property situated at No.2/14-3, Sri Mahalakshmi Gardens Phase III, Karayampalayam, Sulur Taluk, Chinniyampalayam, Coimbatore District. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondent :Ms.S.R.Sumathy ____________Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.26893 of 2025ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)None for petitioner. Ms.S.R.Sumathy, learned counsel appears for respondent.
When the case was taken up on the last date of hearing, no one appeared for petitioner. One more opportunity was granted by this Court.
Operative part
Today also, no one appears for petitioner. Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim applications are also dismissed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J) 21.08.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Nokpl____________Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.26893 of 2025ToThe Authorised Officer Canara BankPeelamedu BranchPVG Towers TextilesPeelamedu, Coimbatore District.____________Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.26893 of 2025THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SUNDER MOHAN,J. (kpl) W.P.No.26893 of 2025 21.08.2025____________Page 4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.