✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

N SATHISH KUMAR, ANDR SAKTHIVEL

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, this petition is ordered as prayed for. Registry is directed to make necessary and consequential amendments in the cause title.[N.S.K.,J.] [R.S.V.,J.] 08.01.2026 gpa2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.27256 of 2025 in A.S.No.47 of 2023 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.,ANDR. SAKTHIVEL, J.,gpaC.M.P.No.27256 of 2025inA.S.No.47 of 202308.01.20263/3

Judgment

C.M.P.No.27256 of 2025 in A.S.No.47 of 2023IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 08.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR . JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMARANDTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVELC.M.P.No.27256 of 2025 in A.S.No.47 of 20231. Gita2. Mrs.K.Punitha ... PetitionersVersusMrs. Rosabel Kirubakaran (deceased)

1.

Mrs. Vinita Anand2. Mr.Ranjit Daniel ... RespondentsPetition filed under Order XXII Rule 2 of CPC to prefix the word “Deceased’ before the name of the first respondent in A.S.No.47 of 2023.For Petitioners: Mr.K.IlangoFor Respondents: Mr.B.Sasidaranfor M/s.S and P Legal for R2 and R31/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.27256 of 2025 in A.S.No.47 of 2023

O R D E R(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)This petition has been filed to to prefix the word “Deceased’ before the name of the first respondent in A.S.No.47 of 2023.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the first respondent died on 09.12.2024 and as the legal heirs of the first respondent are already on record, only the word “Deceased’ has to be prefixed to the name of the first respondent.

3.

Considering the submissions made and being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, we are inclined to allow this petition.

4.

Accordingly, this petition is ordered as prayed for. Registry is directed to make necessary and consequential amendments in the cause title.[N.S.K.,J.] [R.S.V.,J.] 08.01.2026 gpa2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.27256 of 2025 in A.S.No.47 of 2023 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.,ANDR. SAKTHIVEL, J.,gpaC.M.P.No.27256 of 2025inA.S.No.47 of 202308.01.20263/3

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments