Profectus Caapital Private Limited v. Sign Care Proprietor Mr.K.Senthil Nathan
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.02.2025CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSEArb. Appln. No.803 of 2024Profectus Caapital Private Limited, rep. by its Authorised SignatoryMr.A.Johnson.. ApplicantvsSign Care Proprietor Mr.K.Senthil Nathan.. Respondent ORDERLearned counsel for the applicant would submit that the initial remuneration of the Advocate Commissioner has been paid. She would submit, on instructions that the vehicle will be traced within a week and the Advocate Commissioner will be executing the warrant of commission. The said representation made by the learned counsel for the applicant is recorded. 2.It is made clear that if the Advocate Commissioner is unable to re-possess the vehicle before the next hearing date, this Court will pass necessary orders on the next hearing date. Post the matter on 25.02.2025. 10.02.2025vga1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.vgaArb. Appln. No.803 of 202410.02.20252/2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.