Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Learned counsel for the respondent also drew the attention of this Court to the impugned Award and would submit that only due to the reason that the appellant/claimant did not produce the originals, the claim came to be dismissed. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2829 of 20214.…
Judgment
C.M.A.No.2829 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 04.04.2024CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSEC.M.A.No.2829 of 2021P.Sellammal ... Appellant..Vs..The Managing DirectorTamilnadu State Express Transport CorporationThiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002. ...RespondentPrayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award and decree dated 21.08.2019 made in MCOP No.2937 of 2015, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal Special Judge), Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.K.Varadha KamarajFor Respondent: Mr.K.Kathiresan Standing Counsel1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2829 of 2021 J U D G M E N T This appeal has been filed, challenging the award of the Tribunal under which the claim filed by the appellant seeking compensation from the respondent for the injuries sustained by her, as a result of an accident caused by a bus owned by the respondent Corporation has been dismissed on the ground that the appellant/claimant has not produced the originals of all the documents which she relies upon.
Learned counsel for the appellant/claimant would now submit that the appellant is prepared to produce all the original documents, if so required before the Tribunal.
Operative part
Learned counsel for the respondent also drew the attention of this Court to the impugned Award and would submit that only due to the reason that the appellant/claimant did not produce the originals, the claim came to be dismissed. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2829 of 20214. When, the learned counsel for the appellant on instructions would submit that the appellant/claimant is willing to produce all the original documents, no prejudice would be caused to the respondent, if the matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration to enable the appellant to produce the originals. The legislation being a welfare legislation, the interest of the accident victims should be protected. 5. Therefore, after recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant on instructions that the appellant shall produce the originals of all the documents which the appellant/claimant is going to rely upon for the purpose of claiming compensation, the impugned award dated 21.08.2019 passed in M.C.O.P No.2937 of 2015 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Principal Special Judge, Chennai, is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded back to the very same Tribunal for fresh consideration on merits and in accordance with law, by permitting the appellant to produce the originals of all the documents. The Tribunal, on remand shall dispose the MCOP preferably within a period of six months 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2829 of 2021from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed. No costs. 04.04.2024Index: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderuma To1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/ Principal Special Judge, Chennai. 2. The Section Officer V.R.Section, High Court of Madras. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2829 of 2021 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.uma C.M.A.No.2829 of 2021 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2829 of 202104.04.20246/6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.