✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

R SUBRAMANIAN, C KUMARAPPAN

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Hence, this petition is dismissed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Hence, this petition is dismissed. (R.S.M., J.) (C.K., J.) 22.11.2024 dsa

Judgment

C.M.P.No.25855 of 2024in A.S.No.956 of 2024R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.andC.KUMARAPPAN, J. The petitioners seek an order of stay of operation of the judgment and decree dated 27.08.2024.

2.

The decree is one for declaration that the settlement deed dated 16.07.2014 is null and void and for a consequential injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession of the plaintiff. As such there is no executable decree, which could be stayed.

3.

Mr.P.R.Raman, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that though the defendants sought for an injunction pending suit, the same was not granted.

Operative part

4.

Hence, this petition is dismissed. (R.S.M., J.) (C.K., J.) 22.11.2024 dsa

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments