Karthik v. The State
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement so made, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
CRL OP No. 12500 of 2026__________Page1 of 2IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 08-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPANCRL OP No. 12500 of 2026 Karthik..Petitioner(s)VsThe State Rep By, The Inspector of PoliceT-4 Madhuravoyal Police Station, Chennai. Cr.No.494 of 2025...Respondent(s)PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in CC.No.1673 of 2025 pending trial before the 1st Additional Special Judge for NDPS cases at Chennai. For Petitioner(s):Mr.R.C.Paul KanagarajFor Respondent(s):Mr.S.Yogaraja SekarGovernment Advocate (Criminal side)ORDERMr.R.C.Paul Kanagaraj, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement so made, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 08-06-2026ep https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 12500 of 2026__________Page2 of 2C.KUMARAPPAN, J.EPTo1.The Inspector of PoliceT-4, Madhuravoyal Police Station, Chennai. 2. The Public ProsecutorHigh Court of Madras.CRL OP No. 12500 of 202608-06-2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement so made, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.