Rajeshkumar @ Pulsar Rajesh v. The State
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Crl.O.P.No.24227 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAM THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRANCrl.O.P.No.24229 of 2025 Rajeshkumar @ Pulsar Rajesh ... PetitionerVs.The State Rep. by:-The Inspector of Police,E-5, Sholavaram Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.444 of 2025) ... RespondentPRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in connection with Crime No.444 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr.D.PadmanabhanFor Respondent: Mr.A.GopinathGovernment Advocate (Crl.side)
Operative part
O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect. Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.24227 of 2025rpl2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 03.09.2025rplTo1.The Inspector of Police,E-5, Sholavaram Police Station, Chennai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Crl.O.P.No.24229 of 20252/2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.