Bhagavat Singh v. The State Rep.byThe Sub Inspector of Police
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of, since the grievance of the petitioner been already redressed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Crl.O.P.No.17035 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.07.2024CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRANCrl.O.P.No.17035 of 2024 Bhagavat Singh ... Petitioner Vs.The State Rep.by The Sub Inspector of Police,C2, Elephant Gate Police Station, Waltax Road, Chennai-600 079.FIR.No.4 of 2024 ... RespondentPrayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, pleased to set aside the order dated 22.05.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.No.4876 of 2024 by the VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai-600 001. For Petitioner : Mr.J.NagarajanFor Respondent: Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate dismissing the application to defreeze the bank account.1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.17035 of 2024Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.rpl2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police states that the Investigating Officer has instructed the bank on 19.07.2024 to defreeze the account of the petitioner. 3. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of, since the grievance of the petitioner been already redressed.22.07.2024Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NorplTo1.The VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai-600 001.
The Sub Inspector of Police,C2, Elephant Gate Police Station, Waltax Road, Chennai-600 079.
The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. Crl.O.P.No.17035 of 20242/2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of, since the grievance of the petitioner been already redressed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.